Carl Smith provides a look at the invisible emotional labour of school leadership, where professionalism is polished, patience is infinite, and the truest reactions live quietly in unsent drafts.

Locked in? The detention debacle

There are complaints, and then there are complaints. The kind that arrives in your inbox at 11.59pm, subject line: “URGENT – OFFICIAL COMPLAINT”. Your heart sinks, and you wrestle with the dilemma of whether to open it there and then (hint: the answer is no).

This one was about detention. Or, more specifically, about what happened when your child discovered that actions have consequences. Now school leaders are pretty good these days at responding to complaints, but what if you added in brackets what you’re really thinking...

Dear parent,

Thank you for your recent email expressing concern about the distressing incident involving your child and their after-school detention.

We take all matters of student welfare extremely seriously ( even when the matter involves your child being asked to sit quietly for 20 minutes and reflect on why repeatedly ignoring instructions was a bad idea).

First, let us reassure you that the dignity and happiness of every child is our top priority ( although, admittedly, dignity is hard to maintain when you’re loudly declaring, “This is a violation of my human rights!” while doing your RE homework).

We spoke to the supervising staff and reviewed the circumstances ( which, for the record, began when your child arrived late to three lessons and informed the teacher each time, “I was doing something important, bruv”). While we appreciate your suggestion that this was ‘a misunderstanding’, our findings indicate that the misunderstanding was between your child and the concept of punctuality.

As part of our commitment to restorative practice, we have arranged a meeting with your child to discuss the importance of following expectations ( that is, not throwing sandwiches at your mates during the detention). We will also remind all students about the purpose of detention, even though this is the first time anyone has attempted to negotiate early release on the grounds of “emotional damage caused by fluorescent lighting”.

You raised a valid point about communication. Please be assured that staff will continue to inform parents promptly about detentions ( though we cannot guarantee your child will stop messaging you mid-sentence with, “HELP, THEY’RE NOT EVEN ALLOWING ME TO HAVE A WEE”).

Finally, we note your request for the school to abolish detentions entirely. While we understand your concern, we believe consequences remain an important part of learning ( unless failing to anticipate a campaign for ‘Detention-Free Schools’ counts as negligence).

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We value your partnership in maintaining high standards of behaviour ( and low levels of melodrama in the reflection room).

Yours sincerely,

The Leadership Team

Reflection

Schools are expected to handle everything, from safeguarding to fluorescent-light diplomacy, with grace and professionalism. And we do. But sometimes, behind the polished email, there is a school leader wondering how this became their Tuesday/Wednesday/ Thursday and so forth.

Because if education teaches us anything, it’s that the unexpected will happen. And when it does, we’ll respond with calm courtesy, and a bracketed truth that never makes it past the send button.

Carl Smith is Principal at Casterton College Rutland (CCR)

Want the last word?

Last Word always welcomes contributions from members. If you’d like to share your humorous observations of school life, email Permjit Mann at leader@ascl.org.uk
ASCL offers a modest honorarium.

Designed with IMPACT

© 2026 Association of School and College Leaders | Valid XHTML | Contact us