2026 Autumn Term

Features

  • Rewiring costs money
    The government can't rewire education with rhetoric alone. Pepe Di'Iasio argues that real change will depend on putting the funding in place to make its ambitions a reality. More
  • Working on wellbeing
    With prevailing working conditions affecting the sustainability of school improvement and leadership capacity, Chris Ingate looks at one school that is prioritising staff wellbeing as a key strategic objective. More
  • Building a lasting safeguarding culture
    Schools that keep children safest are those that embed safeguarding into everyday culture, where professional curiosity, shared responsibility, and decisive action shape every conversation, behaviour, and leadership decision says Director of Safeguarding Delyth Lynch. More
  • The attendance challenge
    Improving school attendance starts with understanding what lies behind absence says Senior Research Manager at the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) Dr Emma Moore. Here, she highlights the latest findings. More
  • Caught on record?
    Recordings are an increasingly common and contested part of school and college life. Deborah Allen explains how policies, boundaries and well-trained staff can protect everyone without limiting reasonable access. More
  • Conditions to lead
    Kathryn Morgan and Professor Toby Greany argue that sustainable school and college leadership requires more than managing workload. For reform to succeed, leaders need the capacity and agency to lead it. More

Schools that keep children safest are those that embed safeguarding into everyday culture, where professional curiosity, shared responsibility, and decisive action shape every conversation, behaviour, and leadership decision says Director of Safeguarding Delyth Lynch.

Building a lasting safeguarding culture

Safeguarding has never been more prominent in educational leadership. With the publication of Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) 2026, the DfE reinforces what many of us working in schools have known for some time: safeguarding is not simply an operational responsibility delegated to a designated safeguarding lead (DSL); it is a strategic priority that sits at the heart of school leadership.

Schools are navigating increasingly complex safeguarding concerns while responding to evolving statutory guidance, growing levels of need among children and young people, and heightened expectations from parents, governors, and inspection teams. In this context, KCSIE 2026 places renewed emphasis on leadership responsibility for creating and sustaining a strong safeguarding culture.

While policies, procedures, and compliance remain essential, the message is clear: safeguarding is about far more than meeting statutory requirements.

Effective safeguarding is not about having more policies; it is about making safeguarding part of everyday culture, conversations, and decision making, with staff confident to act and share concerns.

Compliance provides the framework. Culture determines whether children are truly safe within it.

The most effective schools understand that safeguarding is not a document, a meeting, or an annual training session. It is the collective attitudes, behaviours, and decisions that shape everyday life. It influences how adults interact with children, how concerns are noticed and acted upon, how risk is understood, and how leaders respond when things go wrong.

The challenge for leaders, therefore, is not simply to achieve compliance: it is to build a culture that endures.

Moving from ownership to shared ownership 

One of the most common challenges I encounter when working with schools – and, if I am honest, one I have reflected on within my own setting – is the belief that safeguarding belongs primarily to the DSL and deputies.

While DSLs play a critical leadership role, safeguarding cannot rest on the shoulders of one or two individuals. Sustainable safeguarding depends upon collective responsibility.

Every adult in the organisation has a role in safeguarding. When everyone understands their responsibility and why it matters, safeguarding becomes a shared culture, not just an assigned task.

A question every school leader should ask is: If your DSL left tomorrow, would your safeguarding culture remain strong? The answer can provide a powerful insight into where safeguarding leadership truly sits within an organisation.

Understanding your school’s safeguarding DNA 

Every school has its own safeguarding story: age range, community demographics, SEND profile, boarding provision, location, staffing structures, and organisational history all contribute to a unique safeguarding landscape. No two schools face the same challenges, which is why generic approaches to safeguarding improvement rarely go far enough.

I often talk about understanding a school’s safeguarding DNA. This requires leaders to be curious. Where are the vulnerabilities within your setting? Which groups of pupils may experience greater risk? Are there physical spaces that warrant greater scrutiny? Are there long-held traditions or ways of working that may unintentionally create blind spots?

The strongest safeguarding cultures are characterised by professional curiosity. They resist assumptions, remain open to challenge, and recognise that risk is constantly evolving. They understand that safeguarding is not static; it requires continual reflection and adaptation.

Creating a culture of courageous conversations 

Serious safeguarding failures often happen when people notice something but hesitate to speak up, because they doubt themselves, assume someone else will act, or do not see it as significant. This is why psychological safety is essential.

Staff must feel confident raising concerns, asking difficult questions, and respectfully challenging decisions. They need to know that safeguarding concerns will be met with curiosity rather than defensiveness and support rather than criticism, and leaders play a crucial role in modelling this.

How do we respond when concerns are raised? Do staff see challenge being welcomed or dismissed? Are mistakes viewed as opportunities for learning or occasions for blame? Are difficult conversations avoided or embraced? 

A culture of professional challenge is not about criticism. It is about creating an environment where safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility and where concerns can be explored openly and respectfully. One of the most powerful safeguarding questions a school can ask is: “Are we getting this right?” 

When leaders model humility, vulnerability and reflection, they create permission for others to do the same. Staff become more willing to notice, to question and to challenge because they trust that those actions will be valued.

Embedding values into everyday practice 

Policies matter, but values drive behaviour. In my own school, values such as kindness, integrity, courage, responsibility and respect sit at the heart of our safeguarding culture. However, values only become meaningful when they move beyond posters and strategic plans: they must be visible in everyday practice.

They shape recruitment decisions, performance conversations, curriculum design, staff development and interactions with pupils. They influence how adults speak to one another, how concerns are handled and how decisions are made when situations become complex.

When safeguarding is rooted in shared values, it becomes more resilient. Staff are guided not only by procedures, but by a deeper understanding of what safe, ethical and child-centred practice looks like.

Embracing continuous reflection 

One of the greatest risks in safeguarding leadership is assuming that what worked last year will still be sufficient next year. Safeguarding is never finished and should be thought of as a cyclical vortex of reflection.

Effective safeguarding cultures are characterised by continual consideration. Leaders assess strengths and vulnerabilities, implement change, review impact and then begin the process again. Listening to staff voice, seeking pupil feedback, analysing patterns in concerns, reviewing practice and learning from incidents all contribute to improvement.

Importantly, schools should not wait for inspections, audits or serious incidents before asking searching questions about culture.The most effective organisations maintain a mindset of continual learning. They remain curious about how they can become safer, stronger and more responsive to the needs of children.

Looking after the people who lead safeguarding 

Finally, we must acknowledge the human dimension of safeguarding leadership. DSLs and safeguarding teams carry significant responsibility, now more than ever before. They navigate uncertainty, make complex decisions and support children experiencing some of the most challenging circumstances imaginable.

Supervision, reflective practice and supportive leadership are essential to effective safeguarding. Investing in safeguarding leaders’ wellbeing and development ultimately strengthens pupil safety.

Beyond compliance 

The most successful safeguarding cultures are not built through a single policy, training programme or inspection framework. They are built through thousands of everyday decisions, conversations and actions.

They are created when safeguarding is understood, embraced and owned by everyone. They flourish when leaders choose curiosity over complacency, reflection over assumption and culture over compliance.

Ultimately, safeguarding is not something a school simply does. It is something a school becomes.


Delyth Lynch 
Director of Safeguarding at Wellington College and author of Beyond Compliance: A DSL’s Guide to creating a school-wide culture of safeguarding
www.crownhouse.co.uk/beyond-compliance

L138_Lasting-safeguarding-culture.jpg

LEADING READING